Spoken language

15
 m

Teach and/or support learning

How students learn, both generally and within their subject/disciplinary area(s)

What can I do?

Impact
3
Quality
3
  • Use conversational language in teaching materials by including “you” and “I” statements
  • Address the student directly in instructions and explanations
  • Keep sessions short when using conversational text to maintain the effect

What is this about?

This summary is about using spoken or conversational-style language in teaching materials. It means designing texts that sound more like a person talking to another person. For example, saying “Let me show you how photosynthesis works” instead of “Photosynthesis is a process that…”. This approach makes students feel more connected and engaged, which helps them remember and use what they learn.

What's the evidence say?

Conversational-style language boosts both retention (d = 0.30 ➕➕➕) and especially transfer (d = 0.54 ➕➕➕), helping students apply knowledge to new problems. It also increases perceived friendliness (d = 0.46) and supports effective cognitive processing (d = 0.62). The effects are consistent across subject areas and media formats. However, instructional sessions longer than 35 minutes showed little to no benefit, suggesting the strategy works best in short bursts.

What's the underlying theory?

The Personalisation Principle from Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning suggests people learn better when instruction sounds like a conversation. Social cues, like using “you” and “I”, prompt students to process information more deeply — just like they do in real conversations. This helps activate prior knowledge, increase motivation, and improve comprehension and problem-solving.

Where does the evidence come from?

This summary is based on a single high-quality meta-analysis (Ginns et al., 2013), which included 74 effect sizes from 22 studies. It analysed both learning outcomes (like retention and transfer) and processes (like friendliness and interest). The study examined a range of moderators and used robust statistical methods. Though some small effects were found for interest and learning assistance, the effects on transfer were the most consistent and practically significant.

References

Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Designing instructional text in a conversational style: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 25(4), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9228-0

Additional Resources