Service-learning and Community engagement

15
 m

Design and plan learning activities and/or programmes of study

Acknowledge the wider context in which higher education operates, recognising the implications for professional practice

What can I do?

Impact
3
Quality
2
  • Link service-learning projects directly to academic content and course goals
  • Include structured opportunities for students to reflect on their service experiences
  • Make service-learning a required part of the course to maximise its impact

What is this about?

Service-learning is a teaching method that combines community service with academic learning. It helps students apply what they learn in class to real-world problems, while also reflecting on their experiences. This approach can improve their understanding of academic content, develop personal skills like confidence, and foster civic responsibility. Unlike volunteering, service-learning is tied to coursework and includes guided reflection. It's used across many subjects, from nursing and business to social sciences and computer science.

What's the evidence say?

Service-learning improves cognitive outcomes (Yorio & Ye, δ = .52 ➕➕➕), academic performance (Celio et al., d = .43 ➕➕➕), and understanding of social issues (Yorio & Ye, δ = .34 ➕➕➕). It also enhances personal insight (δ = .28 ➕➕➕), social skills (Celio et al., d = .27 ➕➕➕), and civic engagement (Celio et al., d = .31 ➕➕➕). Programs that include structured reflection and are integrated with academic content have stronger effects. Shorter programs or those lacking reflection have weaker or inconsistent outcomes.

What's the underlying theory?

Service-learning is grounded in Dewey’s experiential learning theory and Kolb’s learning cycle, which emphasise learning through doing and reflecting. These theories suggest that students learn best when they can actively apply their knowledge and reflect on their experiences. Reflection transforms experience into knowledge, while real-world service motivates students and gives context to their learning. Social-cognitive and constructivist theories also support the idea that students learn by interacting with others and constructing meaning from experiences.

Where does the evidence come from?

This summary draws on several high-quality meta-analyses. Yorio and Ye (2012) analysed effects on social, personal, and cognitive learning outcomes. Celio et al. (2011) reviewed 62 studies showing consistent benefits across five domains. Conway et al. (2009) included 103 samples and examined academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Novak et al. (2007) reported a moderate effect on cognitive outcomes (d = .42). These studies are robust, with large sample sizes and clear inclusion criteria, lending strong support to the conclusions.

References

Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382591103400205

Conway, J. M., Amel, E. L., & Gerwien, D. P. (2009). Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning's effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 36(4), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280903172969

Novak, J. M., Markey, V., & Allen, M. (2007). Evaluating cognitive outcomes of service learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports, 24(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090701304881

Yorio, P. L., & Ye, F. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0072

Additional Resources