Problem-based learning

10
 m

Teach and/or support learning

How students learn, both generally and within their subject/disciplinary area(s)

What can I do?

Impact
4
Quality
4
  • Use small-group PBL to build students’ critical thinking and application of knowledge
  • Run PBL sessions for at least a medium-term period — short bursts don’t work as well
  • Use PBL in subjects like medicine, science, and social sciences where problems are rich and open-ended

What is this about?

Problem-based learning (PBL) is a teaching approach where students learn by solving real or realistic problems. Instead of getting information first, students are presented with a problem and work together to figure out what they need to learn to solve it. This approach encourages active learning, teamwork, and thinking skills. PBL is often used in higher education because it helps students become better problem solvers, decision makers, and critical thinkers — skills they need in real life.

What's the evidence say?

PBL improves students’ critical thinking skills with a medium to large effect size ➕➕➕➕ (Liu & Pásztor, 2022; Hafizah et al., 2024). It is especially effective for skills development ➕➕➕➕➕ (Dochy et al., 2003). However, it may slightly reduce short-term factual knowledge compared to traditional methods ➕➕. PBL works better when:

  • Implemented over the medium to long term ➕➕➕
  • Used with university or senior students ➕➕➕
  • Applied in medicine, science, or geography ➕➕➕
  • Group sizes are less than 6 for CT skills, but more than 10 for general improvement ➕➕➕

It also leads to slightly improved attitudes towards learning ➕➕ (Demirel & Dağyar, 2016), especially when students see value in solving problems collaboratively.

What's the underlying theory?

PBL is rooted in constructivist learning theory, which says students learn best by actively constructing knowledge through experience. It also draws on self-directed learning theory, where learners take responsibility for their own learning. Social constructivism explains the benefit of small group work — we learn through discussion and collaboration. And cognitive apprenticeship underpins how students learn from each other and from facilitators who guide the process, rather than just delivering content.

Where does the evidence come from?

This summary is based on six meta-analyses published between 2003 and 2024. Liu & Pásztor (2022) and Hafizah et al. (2024) focus on critical thinking and include over 70 studies with broad international coverage. Dochy et al. (2003) and Gijbels et al. (2005) analyse knowledge and skills outcomes across higher education. Demirel & Dağyar (2016) evaluate student attitudes, and the 2024 meta-analysis from Hafizah et al. also confirms effects across disciplines. All studies are peer-reviewed and meet GRADE criteria for high-quality evidence (++++) with clear effect sizes and moderator analysis.

References

Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7

Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027

Liu, O. L., & Pásztor, A. (2022). Does problem-based learning foster critical thinking? A meta-analysis of higher education studies. Educational Research Review, 35, 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100434

Demirel, M., & Dağyar, M. (2016). Effects of problem-based learning on attitude: A meta-analysis study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2115–2137.

Hafizah, M. A., Jamaluddin, S., Jamil, J. M., Zainal, A. R. A., & Yahaya, A. S. (2024). The effect of problem-based learning on critical thinking: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 17(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.1714a

Additional Resources